@potatomeow I keep a list and blogged about it..https://codeberg.org/fediverse/delightful-fediverse-experience/issues/130https://coding.social/blog/prosocial-web/

@chris@social.uggs.io looks cool! Good work, forget the haters.

Yeah, that's kind of the disconnect here. Lemmy and Piefed are content aggregators, but NodeBB is a forum, and historically, those have been more insular in nature, with a local-only-first focus. It's a UX-choice, but definitely not a rejection of the federated nature of ActivityPub — want to make that clear.

@fediverso@feddit.it @karlos@mindly.socialYes, fedisky.it is a duplex server based on the WAFRN software, which is an Activitypub server on one side and a PSD node on the other. Fedisky.it is reserved for an Italian audience, but if you're interested in trying an English-speaking server, you can find one at this link: https://join.wafrn.net/

@evan oh, I'm sorry.Don't really have those ideas, but it occurred to me that this Indexable functionality sits right at the heart of that tension point for fediverse developers on what is okay to do with public data and what is not, and where there's often controversy and heated debate.Indexable is at the same time a honest attempt to communicate something complex to people on how the network functions. And it is a horror UX as it fails to do so. Now its presence means it has become part of that public data, open to misinterpretation, expectation mismatch, building further on something vague.I think there's nothing in the technology itself that prevents fediverse from becoming just as bad as social media elsewhere already is. The only thing that prevents enshittification in the long term is having those uncomfortable discussions.In other words socio-cultural aspects and subsequent pressures on technology direction are key to success or failure of fediverse in the long term.

@jaz @iftas @swf Shwmae