Salta al contenuto
Logo del marchio

Citiverse
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. #fedi #askfediIs the #ActivityPub protocol any closer to having data portability?
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

#fedi #askfediIs the #ActivityPub protocol any closer to having data portability?

General Discussion
24 6 4
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere

  • apps@toot.fedilab.appA

    #ActivityPub carries posts, follows, likes and so on, but not moderation.

    General Discussion activitypub holossocial
    13
    0 Votazioni
    13 Post
    1 Visualizzazioni
    informapirata@activitypub.spaceI
    @apps@toot.fedilab.app I agree, although right now it would be enough for me if the different platforms could communicate with each other. For example, a report from Lemmy doesn't reach Mastodon, and vice versa... This is the most pressing issue today, and if we could do it with Activitypub, it would not only be useful, but also "nice."
  • nuages@mediaformat.orgN

    Hello World

    MediaFormat activitypub activitypubapi c2s fediverse
    6
    1 Votazioni
    6 Post
    2 Visualizzazioni
    nuages@mediaformat.orgN
    For anyone curious, here is the current list of projects we are tracking:https://codeberg.org/mediaformat/c2s#tracking-support
  • commonshub@social.peakx.comC

    This is a recent talk that captures the main goal of why we are developing Commonshub.

    General Discussion mastodon fediverse activitypub opensocialweb
    2
    0 Votazioni
    2 Post
    10 Visualizzazioni
    liaizon@social.wake.stL
    @commonshub I looked through your whole website and I left with very little idea of what you are actually providing. Is it suppose to be a forum?
  • julian@activitypub.spaceJ

    Multiple handles for Activity Intents

    Technical Discussion fep 3b86 activitypub
    23
    0 Votazioni
    23 Post
    0 Visualizzazioni
    pfefferle@mastodon.socialP
    @julian @benpate fixed on WordPress.com! (it was a CORS issue, because the API runs under a different domain on DotCom).You should now be able to test on activitypub.blog
  • datacequia@techhub.socialD

    Has anyone done a comparative analysis of various #activitypub implementations on the fediverse?

    Mondo activitypub
    6
    0 Votazioni
    6 Post
    0 Visualizzazioni
    silverpill@mitra.socialS
    @datacequia That's strange, it was online yesterdayhttps://web.archive.org/web/20260424143111/https://funfedi.dev/support_tables/
  • apps@toot.fedilab.appA

    With #Holos, you can have your identity on your own domain.

    Mondo holos activitypub nostr
    6
    0 Votazioni
    6 Post
    0 Visualizzazioni
    rimu@piefed.socialR
    Domains cost money though? I feel like this is such an obvious objection that there must be an easy answer for it. Let's hear it.
  • team@blog.purewebhosting.nzT

    A case for organisations running their own ActivityPub servers

    Mondo activitypub digitalsovereig otago socialmedia wānaka
    3
    1
    1 Votazioni
    3 Post
    142 Visualizzazioni
    macfrancM
    @team@blog.purewebhosting.nz @gwilymgj@mastodon.social Standardising Public Information Publishing I think you should discuss this with the @swf@socialwebfoundation.org group. The issue of standardization is one of the most delicate in the relationship between the fediverse and the mastosphere, and will likely be resolved in different ways based on the so-called "doocracy." It will be important for it to adhere as closely as possible to W3C standards and be conceived in simple terms. Some platforms like Friendica have already solved the formatting of georeferencing and event data. (cc @heluecht@pirati.ca is right?) Should an entity run it’s own presence much like they run their own website or email? It depends a lot on the type of organization. A nonprofit organization could simply choose to be hosted by a federated social network in its own country. A public institution could do the same, but first consider opening a proprietary instance, since, depending on the institution's importance, the traffic flow could become problematic. A private company, on the other hand, has the obligation to create its own instance. If I were to manage an organization's faith migration, I would make these assessments by evaluating the TOSs of the instances in my country and, if I found one suitable, I would agree on my inclusion in advance with the instance administrators. I also remember that careful management of a federated WordPress or Ghost server is already an interesting solution, just as a federated NodeBB forum allows you to wonderfully control the moderation of your audience of interested users. Possible disadvantages Here we must be realistic: using commercial social media for your organization's communication is NEVER perceived as a problem! It will be difficult to obtain the exact costs of managing a social media account, and the employees (or vendors) who manage an organization's social media account are resistant to change. My advice is to find out in advance whether the organization already uses automated publishing systems, whether these systems include at least the Mastodon API, and whether these systems include engagement measurement systems; If they don't use automatic publishing, you can find a system that helps them manage everything more easily. I may be unpopular, but an organization shouldn't be forced to do without commercial social media! Any organization's social media strategy should have three ethical obligations: Maintain a presence on the most popular commercial social media platforms that are consistent with its audience, to ensure maximum reach. Maintain a presence on an open-source social network that allows users to follow the organization and interact with it without being tracked, profiled, or having their data transferred to problematic countries, because this is a guarantee for its customers/users. Prioritize communication on the open social network, publishing content on the federated account earlier and more carefully, and possibly attempting to move communication to the federated account.
  • sozialwelten@ifwo.euS

    End-to-end Encryption (E2EE) over ActivityPub

    General Discussion activitypub e2ee socialweb foundation socialwebfoundation encryption verschlusselung sicherheit privatnachricht
    32
    1
    0 Votazioni
    32 Post
    119 Visualizzazioni
    silverpill@mitra.socialS
    @greyareaI can think of two scenarios where HPKE-level sender authentication or aad binding might be important:1. The sender creates an activity that is attributed to somebody else, encrypts it, and sends to the recipient. This shouldn't be a problem, because the inner activity MUST be portable, and therefore required to have an integrity proof. A compliant recipient can't be fooled into thinking that misattributed activity is real.2. Somebody (e.g. server operator) takes the fep0806:cipherText out of EncryptedActivity, and creates a new activity with the same fep0806:cipherText but different id, actor and/or to. This shouldn't be a problem either. In the worst case, the activity will be delivered to somebody else who will not be able to decrypt it. Replacing id and actor may be even a good thing (obfuscation).it was a giant mess of w3c specs.It's an ever-expanding mess of W3C specs, RFCs and FEPs.Integrity proofs are relatively new, they are described in Data Integrity W3C spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-integrity/

Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.