ActivityPub defines the social graph.
-
ActivityPub defines the social graph. It leaves institutional authority undefined - a verification badge, a moderator's standing, one instance's trust in another are all unsigned platform state. No third party can check any of it.
NOMOI is an open protocol for verifiable delegation of authority, and it needs nothing exotic here: every actor already has a signing key.
Site's live
https://nomoi-labs.com
Spec + Go client, Apache-2.0, on Codeberg. -
ActivityPub defines the social graph. It leaves institutional authority undefined - a verification badge, a moderator's standing, one instance's trust in another are all unsigned platform state. No third party can check any of it.
NOMOI is an open protocol for verifiable delegation of authority, and it needs nothing exotic here: every actor already has a signing key.
Site's live
https://nomoi-labs.com
Spec + Go client, Apache-2.0, on Codeberg. -
ActivityPub defines the social graph. It leaves institutional authority undefined - a verification badge, a moderator's standing, one instance's trust in another are all unsigned platform state. No third party can check any of it.
NOMOI is an open protocol for verifiable delegation of authority, and it needs nothing exotic here: every actor already has a signing key.
Site's live
https://nomoi-labs.com
Spec + Go client, Apache-2.0, on Codeberg.@nomoi
Oh, delegated authority... How did fedi forget to include that? ... -
ActivityPub defines the social graph. It leaves institutional authority undefined - a verification badge, a moderator's standing, one instance's trust in another are all unsigned platform state. No third party can check any of it.
NOMOI is an open protocol for verifiable delegation of authority, and it needs nothing exotic here: every actor already has a signing key.
Site's live
https://nomoi-labs.com
Spec + Go client, Apache-2.0, on Codeberg.@nomoi very interesting! Wasn't able to find out who's driving this though? -
@nomoi very interesting! Wasn't able to find out who's driving this though?
-
@nomoi thanks, that's very helpful. Think you might want to consider adding the players somewhere on your website. At least to me it's important who I give my interest and reading time to. Also helps a little bit to assess how likely something will succeed, especially for topics like this which need a lot of domain expertise and credibility.
-
@nomoi thanks, that's very helpful. Think you might want to consider adding the players somewhere on your website. At least to me it's important who I give my interest and reading time to. Also helps a little bit to assess how likely something will succeed, especially for topics like this which need a lot of domain expertise and credibility.
@thomas I'd rather get more than just my name into the commit logs and eventually just add a contributors section to the website.
Less trying to sell credibility and much more trying to promote a creative idea and am looking for independent review and hopefully adoption.
Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.
Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.
Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗
Registrati Accedi
Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy
to hear more expert opinion on, to learn more about the viability, pros and cons of this approach.