Salta al contenuto
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

Why decentralization doesn't work for forums

Fediverse
95 37 56
  • scritto ultima modifica di parallelminds@lemmy.world
    #1
    Questo post è eliminato!
  • [[topic:post-is-deleted]]
    scritto ultima modifica di
    #2

    What are you talking about?

    What fragmentation? I have had zero problems like that. Yeah, there is content that I am not directly seeing, but that is some seriously bad-quality content and if I want to fry my brain, I can always go to the home instances of the idiots and see their crud there.

    The most important reason why federation is needed is that it's the only known way to keep a forum non-commercial for good. You try adding advertisements to a Fediverse server, you get an exodus of users to other servers that show precisely the same content. If you try adding a mandatory ID check for a Fediverse server, users will migrate to servers who don't have that.

    Any non-federated social media will get facebookified/twitterified once it becomes seriously popular. You simply cannot sustainably run a forum without federation.

  • [[topic:post-is-deleted]]
    scritto ultima modifica di
    #3

    I personally love the way the .Zip admins handled it, both for Lemmy.zip and Piefed.zip. Defederate a very short number of instances (https://lemmy.zip/instances https://piefed.zip/instances?filters=blocked ), hide new joiners unfriendly instances by default for new users onboarding, but still allow people to unhide it.

    We’ve also now enabled a similar welcome message and instance block system to what we’re running on Lemmy.zip. This means some of the spicier instances are blocked by default, which users can remove themselves in the user settings.

    That gives enough freedom to power users while still being welcoming for new joiners.

    Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

  • What are you talking about?

    What fragmentation? I have had zero problems like that. Yeah, there is content that I am not directly seeing, but that is some seriously bad-quality content and if I want to fry my brain, I can always go to the home instances of the idiots and see their crud there.

    The most important reason why federation is needed is that it's the only known way to keep a forum non-commercial for good. You try adding advertisements to a Fediverse server, you get an exodus of users to other servers that show precisely the same content. If you try adding a mandatory ID check for a Fediverse server, users will migrate to servers who don't have that.

    Any non-federated social media will get facebookified/twitterified once it becomes seriously popular. You simply cannot sustainably run a forum without federation.

    scritto ultima modifica di parallelminds@lemmy.world
    #4

    You are a moron, sorry.

  • You are a moron, sorry.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #5

    Because Lemmy is so popular (emoji with rolling eyes and shit).

  • You are a moron, sorry.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #6


    bro what

  • I personally love the way the .Zip admins handled it, both for Lemmy.zip and Piefed.zip. Defederate a very short number of instances (https://lemmy.zip/instances https://piefed.zip/instances?filters=blocked ), hide new joiners unfriendly instances by default for new users onboarding, but still allow people to unhide it.

    We’ve also now enabled a similar welcome message and instance block system to what we’re running on Lemmy.zip. This means some of the spicier instances are blocked by default, which users can remove themselves in the user settings.

    That gives enough freedom to power users while still being welcoming for new joiners.

    Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #7

    Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

    Fecesbook, Shitter, and LickedIn came to my mind first.

    Then there are Reddit and Tumblr and a couple more.

    But all of these are worse experiences than the Fediverse. And I believe that's because the Fediverse is federated.

  • I personally love the way the .Zip admins handled it, both for Lemmy.zip and Piefed.zip. Defederate a very short number of instances (https://lemmy.zip/instances https://piefed.zip/instances?filters=blocked ), hide new joiners unfriendly instances by default for new users onboarding, but still allow people to unhide it.

    We’ve also now enabled a similar welcome message and instance block system to what we’re running on Lemmy.zip. This means some of the spicier instances are blocked by default, which users can remove themselves in the user settings.

    That gives enough freedom to power users while still being welcoming for new joiners.

    Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #8

    I'll give it a look

  • Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

    Fecesbook, Shitter, and LickedIn came to my mind first.

    Then there are Reddit and Tumblr and a couple more.

    But all of these are worse experiences than the Fediverse. And I believe that's because the Fediverse is federated.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #9

    That’s unrelated. Correlation doesn’t prove causation. It’s fair to say you haven’t seen a high-quality centralized forum, but that doesn’t mean one can’t exist.

    Either way, I’m pointing to a real issue with Lemmy that you seem to have overlooked: what happens when instances defederate over ideological or other differences?

  • Also, is there any centralized forum that is more active than the Threadiverse (Lemmy/Piefed/Pylova/Mbin)?

    Fecesbook, Shitter, and LickedIn came to my mind first.

    Then there are Reddit and Tumblr and a couple more.

    But all of these are worse experiences than the Fediverse. And I believe that's because the Fediverse is federated.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #10

    Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn don't follow the Reddit / Threadiverse structure based on communities

  • You are a moron, sorry.

    scritto ultima modifica di prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    #11

    You're a moron

    If you're gonna make opinionated posts like this, you might want to get a little better at accepting criticism or disagreement

  • [[topic:post-is-deleted]]
    scritto ultima modifica di banana@sh.itjust.works
    #12

    The freedom and control I am able to have over what I see vastly outweighs the inconvenience of not having access to all the content always

  • You're a moron

    If you're gonna make opinionated posts like this, you might want to get a little better at accepting criticism or disagreement

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #13

    I have offered counter arguments, insults shouldn't matter. My reply was not a baseless insult, and I actually replied and counter argued. The person I replied to just put a baseless claim and you expect us to just accept it?

  • The freedom and control I am able to have over what I see vastly outweighs the inconvenience of not having access to all the content always

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #14

    Well, personally I'm coming from the angel where I want to see everything first and then judge for my self second.

  • [[topic:post-is-deleted]]
    scritto ultima modifica di
    #15

    Just look at Lemmy and how many communities defederate from one another because of ideological disagreements

    Lol...

    Decentralizing isn't good if you want everyone in the same spot, that is correct...

    But why does everyone need crammed together?

    Some people just don't vibe, if no one wants to federate with an instance, they don't have to.

    I'll never understand why people who grew up with big social media are so hung up up on this idea that one platform has to host everyone.

    Like, a shit ton of fractured forums was the norm for decades, long before Facebook, twitter, or insta. Everyone going to the same place is a new thing, and if people are here it's because they didn't think it worked out.

    You don't, you think it's great for insanely wealthy tech ros to control every conversation.

    Cool.

    Go there, none of us care

  • That’s unrelated. Correlation doesn’t prove causation. It’s fair to say you haven’t seen a high-quality centralized forum, but that doesn’t mean one can’t exist.

    Either way, I’m pointing to a real issue with Lemmy that you seem to have overlooked: what happens when instances defederate over ideological or other differences?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #16

    what happens when instances defederate over ideological or other differences?

    Their users get a better user experience.

  • Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn don't follow the Reddit / Threadiverse structure based on communities

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #17

    Fecesbook does. Over there, communities are called "groups", but it's the same thing. I'm surprised if LickedIn doesn't do the same.

  • Just look at Lemmy and how many communities defederate from one another because of ideological disagreements

    Lol...

    Decentralizing isn't good if you want everyone in the same spot, that is correct...

    But why does everyone need crammed together?

    Some people just don't vibe, if no one wants to federate with an instance, they don't have to.

    I'll never understand why people who grew up with big social media are so hung up up on this idea that one platform has to host everyone.

    Like, a shit ton of fractured forums was the norm for decades, long before Facebook, twitter, or insta. Everyone going to the same place is a new thing, and if people are here it's because they didn't think it worked out.

    You don't, you think it's great for insanely wealthy tech ros to control every conversation.

    Cool.

    Go there, none of us care

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #18

    Because people expect a seamless experience? I don’t want to browse a fragmented platform either, which is kind of the point: if I have to pick an instance, hunt for communities, and hope they federate with the places I care about, what exactly is Lemmy improving over regular forums?

    If fragmentation is the feature, regular forums already did that without pretending they’re one platform. You see my point?

  • what happens when instances defederate over ideological or other differences?

    Their users get a better user experience.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #19

    What are you talking about? What ‘better user experience’? If defederation means communities disappear from each other, why not just use regular forums? They’re already fragmented. Either way, you can’t use your account across defederated Lemmy instances, so you end up with the same thing as regular forums, just with extra steps.

  • Well, personally I'm coming from the angel where I want to see everything first and then judge for my self second.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #20

    I judge for myself plenty, but I've also been on the internet long enough to know I don't owe everyone my ears/eyes. I know how to find the information/communities I want to find - I'd rather seek out what I want to see than sift through that which I do not want to see.


Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.