Salta al contenuto
Logo del marchio

Citiverse
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Anyone working on a Fediverse server where all new code isn't written by AI?
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

Anyone working on a Fediverse server where all new code isn't written by AI?

General Discussion
14 12 6
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere

  • B

    Bumflix Free 1080p Android & Firestick APK - Zero Ads, Instant Multi-CDN Streaming [fediverse]

    Fediverse fediverse
    1
    0 Votazioni
    1 Post
    2 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto
  • T

    One fediverse account for everything

    Fediverse fediverse
    13
    29 Votazioni
    13 Post
    8 Visualizzazioni
    chgxvjh@hexbear.netC
    Seems like a bad idea to let just any instance publish posts on behalf of an identity.
  • strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nzS

    I just added a new watchlist to the fediverse.party wiki, for CMS that have ActivityPub plugins;

    General Discussion fediverseparty activitypub plugins cms
    5
    0 Votazioni
    5 Post
    7 Visualizzazioni
    liaizon@social.wake.stL
    @strypey I think @sutty is a fork of Jekyll with an AP plugin, not sure it that counts
  • bdonvr@thelemmy.clubB

    How does this downvote federate to my instance when the instance of the comm the post is on doesn't allow downvotes?

    Fediverse fediverse
    6
    1
    25 Votazioni
    6 Post
    9 Visualizzazioni
    flamingos@feddit.ukF
    You don't have to be subscribed to see activities in a community (including downvotes) but someone on you instance does for the the community know to send the activities to that instance. Disabling downvotes doesn't actually prevent items being downvoted, it just hides them from those that don't want to see it. Disabling donvotes in the instance setting does prevent them being recorded on that instance. You can see the code here.
  • ozoned@btfree.socialO

    I absolutely love [@itchio@mastodon.social](https://mastodon.social/users/itchio) .

    General Discussion activitypub itch
    3
    0 Votazioni
    3 Post
    21 Visualizzazioni
    ozoned@btfree.socialO
    @julian@activitypub.space @nodebb@fosstodon.org @itchio@mastodon.social while built into a game could be interesting. Achievement system built into a game? <br/> I was talking about the developer's page. <br/> I think AP could enable any number of innovations.
  • rimu@piefed.socialR

    Who decides what you see on the fediverse? A look at voting patterns

    Fediverse fediverse
    102
    2 Votazioni
    102 Post
    38 Visualizzazioni
    openstars@piefed.socialO
    It's been a couple weeks and I wanted to add another perspective about this. I noticed a user downvoting posts, https://lemvotes.org/user/FarStare@lemmy.dbzer0.com if it helps to have specifics. In the more than one full year of existing, they have never once contributed via making a post, never once commenting even, just doling out up- and down-votes in roughly equal proportion, and even those nearly exclusively via posts but almost never comments. I am not concerned about receiving votes from PugJesus - either up or down, as PugJesus has earned the right to speak on behalf of the community. But who is this other person who is influencing how others see my content? Are they male or female? Do they have a degree of some kind? Do they primarily visit meme communities, as the vote pattern might suggest, or other communities as well? So how do I feel about people who use the Threadiverse more than others? My answer is more complex and nuanced than simply yay or nay. I might prefer the opposite of the implemented feature even - the more someone posts (including comments?), the more upvotes they are allowed to make? Have they not earned such? Also, if votes were exposed, each individual could decide for themselves how they wanted to make use of voting - perhaps someone would ban PugJesus, or conversely write special code (a 3rd party app / API recipient?) to highlight posts that PugJesus upvoted (isn't that how "boosting" works? at least re-tweeting does). It's really difficult to guess what someone wants, as each person wants different things. Which is why ultimately in an effort to make things more fair & equitable, the solution can end up making it less so. I like the follow-up suggestion to leave this new option OFF by default, so that an instance admin would have to specifically opt-in, perhaps as part of an overall suite of features limiting things like posts and comments as well. Although really, I think other approaches might work better - e.g. why would someone want to limit themselves to "some" of PugJesus' content, wouldn't they rather simply have it all or else ban him from the instance and therefore have none? I am not seeing the benefit realistically of having "some", especially when the delimiter is not based on community or overall content but simply what time of day (based on an arbitrary threshold for when they starts and ends to restart the next period) the votes are cast?
  • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE

    Tiny reminder to add alt-text to the images and media you post here my FediFriends

    General Discussion mastodon fediverse alttext accessibility
    1
    3 Votazioni
    1 Post
    20 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto
  • firesidefedi@btfree.socialF

    Feed & Follow: The Fedica Revolution - Samir - E89

    General Discussion fediverse activitypub rss podcast vod fedi follow vodcast
    2
    1
    0 Votazioni
    2 Post
    245 Visualizzazioni
    samir@m.fedica.comS
    @firesidefedi @ozoned That was a lot of fun, Anthony, thanks for having me

Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.