🆕 blog!
-
@imikotoba @Edent But seeing now that Kobo sells DRM-free eBooks from Tor Publishing and "standard" Adobe DRM from other publishers, so I don't need one of their e-readers, Kobo also looks good.
@ogeer @imikotoba @Edent
If the survey intends to include people from other countries than the UK it has to be something redeemable from anywhere. -
Woo! It's now official
I'm getting some grant funding to further develop #ActivityBot.
If you have any feature requests or suggestions - or just want to build your own ActivityPub bot - check out https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot
@Edent Well deserved! That thing was really useful to me while figuring out how ActivityPub all fits together. Nice one.
-
Woo! It's now official
I'm getting some grant funding to further develop #ActivityBot.
If you have any feature requests or suggestions - or just want to build your own ActivityPub bot - check out https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot
@Edent most excellent
-
Woo! It's now official
I'm getting some grant funding to further develop #ActivityBot.
If you have any feature requests or suggestions - or just want to build your own ActivityPub bot - check out https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot
@Edent congratulations! I like what you have done with the AGENTS.md file

-
@Edent congratulations! I like what you have done with the AGENTS.md file

@amilm fingers crossed it works

-
Woo! It's now official
I'm getting some grant funding to further develop #ActivityBot.
If you have any feature requests or suggestions - or just want to build your own ActivityPub bot - check out https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot
@Edent congrats!
-
Woo! It's now official
I'm getting some grant funding to further develop #ActivityBot.
If you have any feature requests or suggestions - or just want to build your own ActivityPub bot - check out https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot
I'm going to try and keep a record of all the bugs, errors, and inconsistencies I've reported in #ActivityPub and #Mastodon documentation.
First up, how big are the limits on what you can federate?
Mastodon lists some limits in KB/MB, but others are just raw numbers. That might make sense for an ASCII world - but emoji complicate everything.
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/40290
Documentation: Federation size limits don't show units · Issue #40290 · mastodon/mastodon
The FEDERATION document lists various size limits, but doesn't always explain what units they use. For example: mastodon/FEDERATION.md Lines 84 to 90 in 47ac677 | Limited property | Size limit | Consequence of exceeding the limit | | ---...
GitHub (github.com)
-
I'm going to try and keep a record of all the bugs, errors, and inconsistencies I've reported in #ActivityPub and #Mastodon documentation.
First up, how big are the limits on what you can federate?
Mastodon lists some limits in KB/MB, but others are just raw numbers. That might make sense for an ASCII world - but emoji complicate everything.
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/40290
Documentation: Federation size limits don't show units · Issue #40290 · mastodon/mastodon
The FEDERATION document lists various size limits, but doesn't always explain what units they use. For example: mastodon/FEDERATION.md Lines 84 to 90 in 47ac677 | Limited property | Size limit | Consequence of exceeding the limit | | ---...
GitHub (github.com)
Next is slightly more trivial - a broken internal link in the Mastodon documentation.
https://github.com/mastodon/documentation/issues/1947
Schema link broken - should be relative · Issue #1947 · mastodon/documentation
The documentation at https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#PropertyValue says: As noted above while listing the schema.org @context extensions, Mastodon currently incorrectly expects and maps the term […] However, that link goe...
GitHub (github.com)
-
Next is slightly more trivial - a broken internal link in the Mastodon documentation.
https://github.com/mastodon/documentation/issues/1947
Schema link broken - should be relative · Issue #1947 · mastodon/documentation
The documentation at https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/activitypub/#PropertyValue says: As noted above while listing the schema.org @context extensions, Mastodon currently incorrectly expects and maps the term […] However, that link goe...
GitHub (github.com)
I think the #RFC9421 HTTP Signature algorithm should be explicitly included in #Mastodon's requests.
Feedback welcome - especially those explaining politely why I'm a wrong about this.
Moving signatures to the standard (RFC 9421)? · Issue #29905 · mastodon/mastodon
Pitch There is now an Internet standard for HTTP signatures, RFC 9421. As far as I know (but I read the last versions of the draft too quickly), they are different from the signatures used by Mastodon. COuld it be a good idea to move to ...
GitHub (github.com)
-
I think the #RFC9421 HTTP Signature algorithm should be explicitly included in #Mastodon's requests.
Feedback welcome - especially those explaining politely why I'm a wrong about this.
Moving signatures to the standard (RFC 9421)? · Issue #29905 · mastodon/mastodon
Pitch There is now an Internet standard for HTTP signatures, RFC 9421. As far as I know (but I read the last versions of the draft too quickly), they are different from the signatures used by Mastodon. COuld it be a good idea to move to ...
GitHub (github.com)
@Edent Currently on vacation so I might misremember, but afair the algorithm is already determined by the key used. So including it would do no harm, but is kind of redundant.
-
@Edent Currently on vacation so I might misremember, but afair the algorithm is already determined by the key used. So including it would do no harm, but is kind of redundant.
@dave I'm not sure I understand.
The *digest* says what algorithm it uses, but it isn't a given that the same algo will be used for the signature, right?I can't find another reference to the algorithm in the public key.
Very happy to be told I'm missing something obvious

-
@dave I'm not sure I understand.
The *digest* says what algorithm it uses, but it isn't a given that the same algo will be used for the signature, right?I can't find another reference to the algorithm in the public key.
Very happy to be told I'm missing something obvious

@Edent RFC9421 only lists a handful of possible algorithms. IIRC if your key is ed25519 only one of them applies, similarly if the key is ecdsa. I think there are two possibilities for RSA keys, but we only support one for legacy reasons and do not plan to encourage future use of RSA so will likely never implement the other. So in practice looking at the key type should be sufficient to determine the algorithm used.
-
@Edent RFC9421 only lists a handful of possible algorithms. IIRC if your key is ed25519 only one of them applies, similarly if the key is ecdsa. I think there are two possibilities for RSA keys, but we only support one for legacy reasons and do not plan to encourage future use of RSA so will likely never implement the other. So in practice looking at the key type should be sufficient to determine the algorithm used.
@dave ah, I think i get it.
Enjoy your holiday

Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.
Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.
Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗
Registrati Accedi
Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy