@Floppy OK!

@evan I love this concept, despite my recent reservations about CC Licenses.

@evan There are a few issues in your FEP, I made some comments on the MR.

@evan
We still talk kind of regularly.
You can always come to the Wednesdays and Sundays calls, why I linked fed.wiki, which has the meeting links. They are continuously on since many years.

Also AP could be interesting to work with. Ward was looking for a pairing partner on this ...

Follow at @k9ox And @rgb And @khinsen And @ruben And so many others.

@isAutonomous

@evan This has been implemented in Pixelfed!

Great work man!

https://browser.pub/https://pixelfed.social/p/dansup/1011533737994993323

https://pixelfed.social/p/dansup/1011533737994993323 · BrowserPub · A browser for exploring ActivityPub and the fediverse

Explore the open social web through the lens of ActivityPub and the fediverse.

(browser.pub)

@evan@cosocial.ca Thanks for putting this together, Evan. While implementing FEP-6757 in Fedify, I found a few errata: schema:license and cc:license use IRIs that don't match Schema.org and ccREL, a couple of example typos, and an open question about @type: @id coercion. I filed them on your tracker: https://codeberg.org/evanp/fep/issues/52.

@hongminhee awesome, thank you!

@hongminhee @evan heh, i see your first two issues are exactly what I mentioned in his MR!

https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/939

FEP-6757: Content License Metadata in ActivityPub

fep - Fediverse Enhancement Proposals

Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

@dansup @hongminhee I made a PR that I think captures all the errors you two reported.

FEP-6757: syntax errors and identifiers

fep - Fediverse Enhancement Proposals

Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

I thought I'd be able to slip it into the original PR, but @FenTiger landed the original really quickly.

#FEP #ActivityPub #CreativeCommons #licensing

@vgrass