@filippo @untitaker @poleguy @dave_andersen to express myself clearer: I don't think "going through the issues of a project not maintained for 4 years to say they've been fixed in a fork elsewhere" in and of itself represents spam; it is relevant communication of clear potential value to its recipients, who opted into hearing it at one point or another. (one could debate whether a PR should have been opened first, but that's getting into "splitting hairs" territory.)

I do however consider LLM contributions themselves spam unless demonstrated otherwise against a high, clear bar

@untitaker @poleguy @filippo @dave_andersen yeah, this completely changes how I feel about its appropriateness..

@untitaker @filippo were I a subscriber I'd be happy to see that someone is putting in the effort I presumably find very necessary!

@filippo seems... fine to me, actually? it's reaching the people interested in the fixes, not just you

@jaffathecake @froztbyte @barubary what I'm hearing here is "the correct reaction is to harass every single person involved in this debacle until they're too afraid to pull more of this shit"