Salta al contenuto
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

The Britannica entry for the Fediverse is really good

Fediverse
27 21 0
  • scritto ultima modifica di
    #1

    It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    #2

    fediverse, decentralized group of social media platforms in which each independent platform can interact freely with any other platform that is part of the group.

    Great that they have an article on it, though their formatting the start of each article like a dictionary entry is a bit odd compared to Wikipedia.

    If it were a Wikipedia article, it would probably need some copyediting to give it a more encyclopedic tone along with in-line citations.

  • fediverse, decentralized group of social media platforms in which each independent platform can interact freely with any other platform that is part of the group.

    Great that they have an article on it, though their formatting the start of each article like a dictionary entry is a bit odd compared to Wikipedia.

    If it were a Wikipedia article, it would probably need some copyediting to give it a more encyclopedic tone along with in-line citations.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #3

    Man, that "can" is doing a fuck of a lot of heavy lifting. lemmy, piefed are 100% when you start going pixelfed or loops, or mastodon the compatibility matrix stops looking like that nice spiderweb.

    you're lucky if you can even finger a user between systems

  • Man, that "can" is doing a fuck of a lot of heavy lifting. lemmy, piefed are 100% when you start going pixelfed or loops, or mastodon the compatibility matrix stops looking like that nice spiderweb.

    you're lucky if you can even finger a user between systems

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #4

    you’re lucky if you can even finger a user between systems

    I'm sure the gals at the blahaj zone are up for it

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #5

    Meta's Threads is also working toward ActivityPub compatibility, which would significantly expand the fediverse user base.

    Um... fuck no, please and thank you!

  • Meta's Threads is also working toward ActivityPub compatibility, which would significantly expand the fediverse user base.

    Um... fuck no, please and thank you!

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #6

    The bad news is: you can already follow accounts bidirectionally between Threads and Mastodon. The good news is: Meta did the bare minimum and seems to have stopped development.

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #7

    How is the fediverse different from traditional social media?

    The fediverse is a decentralized network of social media platforms that freely interact, unlike traditional social media.

    I have a bit of a problem with the term "traditional social media".

    The earliest popular form of social media was Usenet. The first one I ever used was web forums (run on phpBB or similar software). Those have a lot more "tradition" than Facebook or Twitter or TikTok, so why are they calling the latter three (deviations from the decentralized "tradition" of the Internet) "traditional social media"?! Is it just that they're the first form of social media that the authors of that article ever used?

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #8

    eNPV63jSxfdwoKw.png

    I recommend uBlacklist to correct this.

  • How is the fediverse different from traditional social media?

    The fediverse is a decentralized network of social media platforms that freely interact, unlike traditional social media.

    I have a bit of a problem with the term "traditional social media".

    The earliest popular form of social media was Usenet. The first one I ever used was web forums (run on phpBB or similar software). Those have a lot more "tradition" than Facebook or Twitter or TikTok, so why are they calling the latter three (deviations from the decentralized "tradition" of the Internet) "traditional social media"?! Is it just that they're the first form of social media that the authors of that article ever used?

    scritto ultima modifica di 9point6@lemmy.world
    #9

    Those were not considered social media in their heyday as the term was created after them specifically for sites where a user would maintain a non-anonymous profile and post content about themselves and curating a feed based on other profiles followed.

    Forums and Usenet could be considered proto-social-media perhaps given they were clear precursors to it

  • Those were not considered social media in their heyday as the term was created after them specifically for sites where a user would maintain a non-anonymous profile and post content about themselves and curating a feed based on other profiles followed.

    Forums and Usenet could be considered proto-social-media perhaps given they were clear precursors to it

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #10

    Of course. I find "social media" a suboptimal term anyway. A good term for the concept is the "participatory Internet".

    But if we are going to use it, then it's just media that is produced by society at large as opposed to paid journalists or authors. Meaning Usenet is social media.

  • you’re lucky if you can even finger a user between systems

    I'm sure the gals at the blahaj zone are up for it

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #11

    Can confirm. Finger me between systems, bby!

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #12

    Unlike X (formerly Twitter) or Facebook, which remain in business by profiting from consumers’ personal information, the fediverse aims to give users privacy and an ad-free interface.

  • fediverse, decentralized group of social media platforms in which each independent platform can interact freely with any other platform that is part of the group.

    Great that they have an article on it, though their formatting the start of each article like a dictionary entry is a bit odd compared to Wikipedia.

    If it were a Wikipedia article, it would probably need some copyediting to give it a more encyclopedic tone along with in-line citations.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #13

    Tbh I never understood the Lemmy users can interact with all other platforms that share the same protocol.

    It's not like I can view a Mastodon user's history on Lemny, right?

  • Tbh I never understood the Lemmy users can interact with all other platforms that share the same protocol.

    It's not like I can view a Mastodon user's history on Lemny, right?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #14

    It's not like I can view a Mastodon user's history on Lemny, right?

    afaik you can

  • Tbh I never understood the Lemmy users can interact with all other platforms that share the same protocol.

    It's not like I can view a Mastodon user's history on Lemny, right?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #15

    From mastodon viewing lemmy stuff is nice enough. It would be great if you could seamlessly crosspost and share between platforms.

  • Tbh I never understood the Lemmy users can interact with all other platforms that share the same protocol.

    It's not like I can view a Mastodon user's history on Lemny, right?

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #16

    Lemmy and history, no. On Lemmy you can see comments from Mastodon and posts (toot with a Lemmy community pinged inside. Which is rarely done but happens). But not the toots themselves
    Piefed now allows to directly follow accounts (similar to Mastodon, Friendica, etc) and you can start getting the new toots after following an account https://piefed.zip/c/microblogs

  • scritto ultima modifica di
    #17

    ehh.. just tested and it doesn't seem to work.. somehow i remembered it working but maybe i was mistaken

    sorry for the misinformation

  • ehh.. just tested and it doesn't seem to work.. somehow i remembered it working but maybe i was mistaken

    sorry for the misinformation

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #18

    Yeah, I keep trying the different things. We're really not using the fediverse for all it's capable of.

    We can generally see all the users on all the federated systems, but none of their old content, a limited number of systems can follow other systems and see new stuff.

    I'd really like to see being able to log into pixelfed.social as rumba@lemmy.zip, post images there (and in loops.video) and reference them in my mastodon and lemmy posts.

    All the interoperability is threadbare.

  • It isn't that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #19

    Lemmy really is growing and I love that we're part of that

  • The bad news is: you can already follow accounts bidirectionally between Threads and Mastodon. The good news is: Meta did the bare minimum and seems to have stopped development.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #20

    You can but iirc it takes quite a bit of bidirectional effort to enable that. Thankfully!

  • 0 Votazioni
    1 Post
    0 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto
  • Christine Lemmer-Webber - Building a Humane Social Internet

    Fediverse fediverse
    3
    21 Votazioni
    3 Post
    16 Visualizzazioni
    K
    Thanks for linking!
  • Catodon 26.10.0 "Bongo Cat" released!

    Fediverse fediverse misskey catodon
    9
    12 Votazioni
    9 Post
    15 Visualizzazioni
    rako@tarte.nuage-libre.frR
    7 months old is recent enough
  • Fediverse is Continuing, Growing, and Strong

    Fediverse fediverse
    4
    39 Votazioni
    4 Post
    22 Visualizzazioni
    V
    Haha. Guess we both replied basically the same thing to the post. Does look like +50k real growth over the last month. With the caveat that that is only counting the software I track, so could be greater.
  • 0 Votazioni
    2 Post
    35 Visualizzazioni
    cookifed@fosstodon.orgC
    We're still in kinda stealth mode, as we don't have any formal release yet, and our instances are invite-only.But we will publish our first release after the holidays, and start openly inviting folks around the same time.Until then, you can find us at https://cookifed.dev !
  • 2 Votazioni
    102 Post
    79 Visualizzazioni
    openstars@piefed.socialO
    It's been a couple weeks and I wanted to add another perspective about this. I noticed a user downvoting posts, https://lemvotes.org/user/FarStare@lemmy.dbzer0.com if it helps to have specifics. In the more than one full year of existing, they have never once contributed via making a post, never once commenting even, just doling out up- and down-votes in roughly equal proportion, and even those nearly exclusively via posts but almost never comments. I am not concerned about receiving votes from PugJesus - either up or down, as PugJesus has earned the right to speak on behalf of the community. But who is this other person who is influencing how others see my content? Are they male or female? Do they have a degree of some kind? Do they primarily visit meme communities, as the vote pattern might suggest, or other communities as well? So how do I feel about people who use the Threadiverse more than others? My answer is more complex and nuanced than simply yay or nay. I might prefer the opposite of the implemented feature even - the more someone posts (including comments?), the more upvotes they are allowed to make? Have they not earned such? Also, if votes were exposed, each individual could decide for themselves how they wanted to make use of voting - perhaps someone would ban PugJesus, or conversely write special code (a 3rd party app / API recipient?) to highlight posts that PugJesus upvoted (isn't that how "boosting" works? at least re-tweeting does). It's really difficult to guess what someone wants, as each person wants different things. Which is why ultimately in an effort to make things more fair & equitable, the solution can end up making it less so. I like the follow-up suggestion to leave this new option OFF by default, so that an instance admin would have to specifically opt-in, perhaps as part of an overall suite of features limiting things like posts and comments as well. Although really, I think other approaches might work better - e.g. why would someone want to limit themselves to "some" of PugJesus' content, wouldn't they rather simply have it all or else ban him from the instance and therefore have none? I am not seeing the benefit realistically of having "some", especially when the delimiter is not based on community or overall content but simply what time of day (based on an arbitrary threshold for when they starts and ends to restart the next period) the votes are cast?
  • The Price of Vibecoding

    Fediverse fediverse bizzfed vibecoding
    9
    1 Votazioni
    9 Post
    22 Visualizzazioni
    H
    That hasn't changed. Devs can continue to accomplish a task independently. This is changing. Not using a skill leads to progressively loosing said skill. Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show.
  • 0 Votazioni
    1 Post
    60 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto

Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.