Salta al contenuto
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

Potential Fediverse alternative to Ao3/SqWA?

Fediverse
11 6 18
  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53757573

    Two months ago, I made this post:

    In this community, about potentially either "colonizing", or forking Squidgeworld Archive (alternative to the fanfiction site ao3).


    Apparently, ao3 has recently shut-down for 2-4 weeks:


    My question is: Should we consider potentially making a Fediverse alternative to Ao3 / SqWA?

    If you head over to the Squidgeworld Archive website, it states that over 2,300+ ao3 users have already migrated over to SqWA from ao3.

    (Now it's over 12,000+ in the last 20 hours ALONE.)

    Just imagine how many people could potentially be brought into the Fediverse, if there were a working federated alternative version of ao3 / SqWA.

    Or if Fediverse users, instead of creating an alternative, instead commited to "colonising" SqWA, instead.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #2

    I've been wishing for a federated AO3 for ages 😝

    Could maybe start from a fork of WriteFreely or even ibis.wiki. The actual long form reading/writing part probably isn't the hardest problem, the very sophisticated tagging is, right?

  • I've been wishing for a federated AO3 for ages 😝

    Could maybe start from a fork of WriteFreely or even ibis.wiki. The actual long form reading/writing part probably isn't the hardest problem, the very sophisticated tagging is, right?

    scritto ultima modifica di teknevra@lemmy.world
    #3

    I know that both Ao3 , and SqWA, use the same open source OTW Code software

  • I know that both Ao3 , and SqWA, use the same open source OTW Code software

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #4

    Oh wow, i didn't know that! Would that make it easier to potentially make like an actual real federated AO3??

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53757573

    Two months ago, I made this post:

    In this community, about potentially either "colonizing", or forking Squidgeworld Archive (alternative to the fanfiction site ao3).


    Apparently, ao3 has recently shut-down for 2-4 weeks:


    My question is: Should we consider potentially making a Fediverse alternative to Ao3 / SqWA?

    If you head over to the Squidgeworld Archive website, it states that over 2,300+ ao3 users have already migrated over to SqWA from ao3.

    (Now it's over 12,000+ in the last 20 hours ALONE.)

    Just imagine how many people could potentially be brought into the Fediverse, if there were a working federated alternative version of ao3 / SqWA.

    Or if Fediverse users, instead of creating an alternative, instead commited to "colonising" SqWA, instead.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #5

    The software is almost completely irrelevant. It's all about the story archive. Given Lemmy's observed distaste for edgy content, I don't think a federated AO3-like repo is likely to fly, but I'd love to be proven wrong. It might be preferable to have a straightforward mirror if that can be arranged with AO3.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53757573

    Two months ago, I made this post:

    In this community, about potentially either "colonizing", or forking Squidgeworld Archive (alternative to the fanfiction site ao3).


    Apparently, ao3 has recently shut-down for 2-4 weeks:


    My question is: Should we consider potentially making a Fediverse alternative to Ao3 / SqWA?

    If you head over to the Squidgeworld Archive website, it states that over 2,300+ ao3 users have already migrated over to SqWA from ao3.

    (Now it's over 12,000+ in the last 20 hours ALONE.)

    Just imagine how many people could potentially be brought into the Fediverse, if there were a working federated alternative version of ao3 / SqWA.

    Or if Fediverse users, instead of creating an alternative, instead commited to "colonising" SqWA, instead.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #6

    The real question is who's willing to help develop this software if someone were to start work on it

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53757573

    Two months ago, I made this post:

    In this community, about potentially either "colonizing", or forking Squidgeworld Archive (alternative to the fanfiction site ao3).


    Apparently, ao3 has recently shut-down for 2-4 weeks:


    My question is: Should we consider potentially making a Fediverse alternative to Ao3 / SqWA?

    If you head over to the Squidgeworld Archive website, it states that over 2,300+ ao3 users have already migrated over to SqWA from ao3.

    (Now it's over 12,000+ in the last 20 hours ALONE.)

    Just imagine how many people could potentially be brought into the Fediverse, if there were a working federated alternative version of ao3 / SqWA.

    Or if Fediverse users, instead of creating an alternative, instead commited to "colonising" SqWA, instead.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #7

    Same boat, but for a Roblox alternative. I've already forked JohnMH's OpenBlox repo but haven't even wrote code to it yet, and I may consider also forking from the Polytoria 2.0 codebase.

  • The real question is who's willing to help develop this software if someone were to start work on it

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #8

    What I was thinking was maybe perhaps having a fork of either WriteFreely, or Ghost, so that you get the federation, etc.

    but also use the same open source OTW Code software, that both Ao3, and SqWA, use, for the benefits/convenience?

    And perhaps, instead of using servers/instances, it instead have each and every profile as it's own separate mini website, complete with dashboard, reading history, fics, etc.?

    I.e. think something similar to how Tumblr handles profiles, but decentralized.

    And each profile would interconnected with each other (unless they defederate).

    Basically, each of the profiles would be their own instance.

    Or something.

    IDK.

    Apologies if this was written weirdly, I am currently at work.

  • What I was thinking was maybe perhaps having a fork of either WriteFreely, or Ghost, so that you get the federation, etc.

    but also use the same open source OTW Code software, that both Ao3, and SqWA, use, for the benefits/convenience?

    And perhaps, instead of using servers/instances, it instead have each and every profile as it's own separate mini website, complete with dashboard, reading history, fics, etc.?

    I.e. think something similar to how Tumblr handles profiles, but decentralized.

    And each profile would interconnected with each other (unless they defederate).

    Basically, each of the profiles would be their own instance.

    Or something.

    IDK.

    Apologies if this was written weirdly, I am currently at work.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #9

    each of the profiles would be their own instance

    So each author would need to host their own infrastructure? I'm not sure I follow

  • each of the profiles would be their own instance

    So each author would need to host their own infrastructure? I'm not sure I follow

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #10

    @soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Would something like Ourchive possibly work?

    Ourchive - GitHub

    I was browsing various different ao3 alternative sites, and I stumbled upon Ourchive.gay

    Which is apparently a decentralized alternative to Ao3.

    Plus, they use Mastodon

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53757573

    Two months ago, I made this post:

    In this community, about potentially either "colonizing", or forking Squidgeworld Archive (alternative to the fanfiction site ao3).


    Apparently, ao3 has recently shut-down for 2-4 weeks:


    My question is: Should we consider potentially making a Fediverse alternative to Ao3 / SqWA?

    If you head over to the Squidgeworld Archive website, it states that over 2,300+ ao3 users have already migrated over to SqWA from ao3.

    (Now it's over 12,000+ in the last 20 hours ALONE.)

    Just imagine how many people could potentially be brought into the Fediverse, if there were a working federated alternative version of ao3 / SqWA.

    Or if Fediverse users, instead of creating an alternative, instead commited to "colonising" SqWA, instead.

    scritto ultima modifica di
    #11

    I don't consume fanfics most of the time, but imo alternatives are always welcomed.

  • LLM vigilance on the Fediverse is lacking

    Fediverse fediverse
    52
    2
    51 Votazioni
    52 Post
    42 Visualizzazioni
    pinto@lemmy.worldP
    So are you ignoring me because you know are wrong or because you think you're right?
  • 2026 - 35 : Let's explore the fediverse 🤓

    Fediverse fediverse fedi-explore
    5
    14 Votazioni
    5 Post
    36 Visualizzazioni
    rimu@piefed.socialR
    I cannot make any sense of what is going on there but that's part of the fun!
  • 28 Votazioni
    6 Post
    26 Visualizzazioni
    O
    Make it so you can browse without an account. I'd like to look before committing to signing up (as many other people likely will, too)
  • RetroLemmy forum. Powered by lemmybb

    Fediverse fediverse
    3
    12 Votazioni
    3 Post
    23 Visualizzazioni
    dosdude@retrolemmy.comD
    Yeah, that's definitely a downside. I'm still happy it worked though!
  • 2 Votazioni
    102 Post
    89 Visualizzazioni
    openstars@piefed.socialO
    It's been a couple weeks and I wanted to add another perspective about this. I noticed a user downvoting posts, https://lemvotes.org/user/FarStare@lemmy.dbzer0.com if it helps to have specifics. In the more than one full year of existing, they have never once contributed via making a post, never once commenting even, just doling out up- and down-votes in roughly equal proportion, and even those nearly exclusively via posts but almost never comments. I am not concerned about receiving votes from PugJesus - either up or down, as PugJesus has earned the right to speak on behalf of the community. But who is this other person who is influencing how others see my content? Are they male or female? Do they have a degree of some kind? Do they primarily visit meme communities, as the vote pattern might suggest, or other communities as well? So how do I feel about people who use the Threadiverse more than others? My answer is more complex and nuanced than simply yay or nay. I might prefer the opposite of the implemented feature even - the more someone posts (including comments?), the more upvotes they are allowed to make? Have they not earned such? Also, if votes were exposed, each individual could decide for themselves how they wanted to make use of voting - perhaps someone would ban PugJesus, or conversely write special code (a 3rd party app / API recipient?) to highlight posts that PugJesus upvoted (isn't that how "boosting" works? at least re-tweeting does). It's really difficult to guess what someone wants, as each person wants different things. Which is why ultimately in an effort to make things more fair & equitable, the solution can end up making it less so. I like the follow-up suggestion to leave this new option OFF by default, so that an instance admin would have to specifically opt-in, perhaps as part of an overall suite of features limiting things like posts and comments as well. Although really, I think other approaches might work better - e.g. why would someone want to limit themselves to "some" of PugJesus' content, wouldn't they rather simply have it all or else ban him from the instance and therefore have none? I am not seeing the benefit realistically of having "some", especially when the delimiter is not based on community or overall content but simply what time of day (based on an arbitrary threshold for when they starts and ends to restart the next period) the votes are cast?
  • We love @Mastodon's new Collections feature.

    General Discussion flipboard news fediverse
    1
    0 Votazioni
    1 Post
    15 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto
  • My latest FOSS Academic post is a doozy.

    General Discussion mastodon fediverse canada
    2
    1 Votazioni
    2 Post
    41 Visualizzazioni
    julian@activitypub.spaceJ
    @rwg@aoir.social usually there's a carve out for smaller instances. If this affects all social networks regardless of size, this makes my business as a purveyor of hosted forums essentially untenable. Watching closely.
  • 2 Votazioni
    6 Post
    40 Visualizzazioni
    apps@toot.fedilab.appA
    @evanYes, I know it. And I'm already thinking about bringing it to Fedilab. My main difficulty right now is being alone with a lot of work already. But I do think it's also my role as a developer to bring things forward. Especially when I believe in it.

Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.