Imagine installing this SSL certificate. Am I the only person who actually looks are the keys?

I have a hard time believing this wasn't intentional at the orders of the famously anti-encryption, anti-privacy Indian government under Modi. It would also have allowed their spy agencies to carry out certain activities with plausible deniability with global reach. I just don't believe incompetence in this case. It's so incompetent it's like it was intentionally engineered to look that way rather than something malicious. I'll not be allowing this company's certs into anything I run ever again.

i can't tell whether or not i should be glad this one did. lol

It's not made by Tesla or Samsuing, so doubt it.

China entered 2026 with about 309,000 plant-protection drones, and those aircraft performed roughly 203 million hectare-treatments during 2025 203 million hectare-treatments ÷ 309,000 plant-protection drones ≈ 1 drone per 6.5 sq km

The llms.txt angle here is a good illustration of how quickly an agent turns text into execution. The structural issue is that the agent runs as a trusted local user, with whatever file and network permissions the developer's machine happens to have. Two things that helped in our case (I build a self-hosted agent workbench, TaskHandoff - docs at https://docs.thandoff.com/, so this is self-promo): Give the agent somewhere disposable to run. We treat each task as bound to a workspace - a machine or environment you registered - so the blast radius of a bad instruction is that workspace rather than your whole fleet. Make the diff the review gate. Nothing lands without a human reading the change. If an agent quietly installed something because a fetched instruction file told it to, that shows up as an unexplained diff instead of silently joining the environment. Neither of these solves prompt injection and I don't want to pretend otherwise. It changes the failure mode from "a repo file executed on a laptop holding cloud credentials" to "a sandboxed workspace got weird and a human rejected the diff". Genuinely curious whether anyone has seen tooling that flags instruction-file-sourced commands explicitly, instead of leaning on diff review after the fact.