Salta al contenuto
Logo del marchio

Citiverse
  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. 📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS of user pins to train it's AI!
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS of user pins to train it's AI!

Technology
8 5 0
  • ?

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840

    📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!

    Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".

    What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!

    It even includes "limited personal information".

    Grounds for a lawsuit? 🤓

    ¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!

    ² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?

    🔗 Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest

    Link Preview Image
    bruce965@lemmy.mlB riskable@programming.devR 2 Risposte
    21
  • ? Ospite

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840

    📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!

    Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".

    What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!

    It even includes "limited personal information".

    Grounds for a lawsuit? 🤓

    ¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!

    ² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?

    🔗 Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest

    Link Preview Image
    bruce965@lemmy.mlB

    ¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1📍.

    admin@lemmy.my-box.devA M ? 3 Risposte
    10
  • bruce965@lemmy.mlB bruce965@lemmy.ml

    ¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1📍.

    admin@lemmy.my-box.devA

    Yeah, but if we assume that one row means 50 csam images, it sounds even more outrageous.

    Being reasonable never got anyone any clicks.

    4
  • bruce965@lemmy.mlB bruce965@lemmy.ml

    ¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1📍.

    M

    Yeah, it's not even capitalized in the source article, so OP just invented a new unit to be 4-6x more outraged, lol.

    Unless it refers to the famous Really Outrageously Wide Stack, usually representing stacks of 16386 records each. Omg, it's over 8 TRILLION pins!

    In short, Pinterest sucks and OP enjoys clickbait writing style. Avoiding both is probably the best way forward.

    5
  • ? Ospite

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840

    📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!

    Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".

    What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!

    It even includes "limited personal information".

    Grounds for a lawsuit? 🤓

    ¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!

    ² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?

    🔗 Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest

    Link Preview Image
    riskable@programming.devR

    This post has triggered my outrage!

    ...because this is totally normal database stuff. Like, where's the meat? My phone could handle 500 million rows of data. Is that supposed to be a lot?

    I'm not exaggerating about the phone part: A modern smartphone can handle an SQLite DB with billions of records (aka "ROWS", LOL).

    ? 1 Risposta
    6
  • bruce965@lemmy.mlB bruce965@lemmy.ml

    ¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1📍.

    ?

    Well pins are usually organized in rows of 4-6, when displayed on Pinterest and in a database each row could have a different type of data, therefore it really isn't that clear to me.

    1
  • ? Ospite

    Well pins are usually organized in rows of 4-6, when displayed on Pinterest and in a database each row could have a different type of data, therefore it really isn't that clear to me.

    bruce965@lemmy.mlB

    Ah, that makes sense too. I just wanted to add my two cents as a software developer. Could be either database rows or graphical rows, I guess.

    1
  • riskable@programming.devR riskable@programming.dev

    This post has triggered my outrage!

    ...because this is totally normal database stuff. Like, where's the meat? My phone could handle 500 million rows of data. Is that supposed to be a lot?

    I'm not exaggerating about the phone part: A modern smartphone can handle an SQLite DB with billions of records (aka "ROWS", LOL).

    ?

    Link Preview Image
    📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS of user pins to train it's AI! - Lemmy.World

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840 [https://lemmy.world/post/51671840] > 📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it’s AI! > > Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims “users have granted Pinterest a license”. > > What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn’t a thing in 2009! > > It even includes “limited personal information”. > > Grounds for a lawsuit? 🤓 > > ¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins! > > ² Post would sound way worse wouldn’t it? > > 🔗 Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest [https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest]

    favicon

    (lemmy.world)

    0
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere

  • T

    Linus Torvalds used AI to fix a Linux bug, and now LLM critics on Linux face an uncomfortable choice

    Technology technology
    16
    30 Votazioni
    16 Post
    1 Visualizzazioni
    H
    WI is abused, no doubt about it. But, AI is fantastic for grunt work and finding hidden bugs. It's like snubbing a tractor because hand plows give you bigger muscles. It's idiotic unless it's nothing more than a hobby. Use your mind/time on better problems.
  • yogthos@lemmy.mlY

    Huawei 800A Liquid-Cooled EV Charging Solves Grid Capacity Limits

    Technology technology
    12
    18 Votazioni
    12 Post
    15 Visualizzazioni
    P
    OP is obsessed with China. Posts stuff non stop that doesn't turn into anything. Typical .ml character. Don't bother engaging, you won't have an actual conversation.
  • zdhzm2pgp@lemmy.mlZ

    Motorola's GrapheneOS phones will launch in 2027 priced higher than Pixels

    Technology technology
    116
    364 Votazioni
    116 Post
    16 Visualizzazioni
    T
    This is supported in AOSP now. No it isn't. GrapheneOS is directly based on AOSP, so it includes everything AOSP does. GOS devs have made it clear they want you to use gestures, and they only include the navbar at all because it's still in AOSP. Inverted navbar is in wide a range of other AOSP custom ROMs, because those developers chose to incorporate it. But it isn't in AOSP by default. This doesn’t seem like a mature thing to say just because you want to flip buttons and are annoyed that the privacy and security-focused project didn’t add a feature to flip buttons. It's an accurate take on their general attitude to polite requests on their github. And the reason the requests are so excessively polite is because people are treading on eggshells due to their diva reputation - albeit, this reputation is somewhat drowned out by their fandom. It's also not mature to downvote people just because you disagree with them. And furthermore, the reason I use the navbar is because I want a force close long-press gesture on the back button, so I can more easily close apps and stop their background processes. To me, that's a fairly important feature for privacy and security. That's also likely a big reason Google pushed away from that, and to see GOS devs align themselves with Google in such a manner raises my eyebrow against them, at the very least.
  • leanleft@lemmy.mlL

    Alibaba says it can build AI data centres in 100 days with modular design

    Technology technology
    4
    22 Votazioni
    4 Post
    15 Visualizzazioni
    E
    The construction of a solar plant needs a lot less than a hundred days. But whether it would be economically viable depends on the location of the data centre. Most of these will probably be built in western China where generation exceeds demand, so they'll probably just connect it to the grid.
  • yogthos@lemmy.mlY

    Unitree launches a seven-axis dexterous arm starting at RMB9,900

    Technology technology
    1
    10 Votazioni
    1 Post
    10 Visualizzazioni
    Nessuno ha risposto
  • yogthos@lemmy.mlY

    Bluesky’s active user base is shrinking as its focus expands beyond the app

    Technology technology
    9
    47 Votazioni
    9 Post
    16 Visualizzazioni
    yogthos@lemmy.mlY
    It's a completely different dynamic from commercial services. It needs enough users to continue developing the software, to operate servers, and to create content on the platform. There is more than enough users on the platform to ensure that it can operate indefinitely at this point. Meanwhile, most people on Mastodon, just as the case is with Lemmy, are on it because they want an open source platform. So, they're not going to jump on another proprietary garbage platform BlueSky or W. And if a better open source platform comes along that's a win for everyone. And I'd argue that chasing growth for the sake of growth can itself be harmful. When you have a slow trickle of new users then they adapt to the existing culture of the platform. But if you have a huge influx of people all at once they can erase the existing communities in the process.
  • W

    OnePlus confirms shutdown in the US and Europe, ending months of speculation

    Technology technology
    6
    0 Votazioni
    6 Post
    10 Visualizzazioni
    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG
    Oneplus has become pretty meh over the years. Nowhere hear the value it used to be.
  • yogthos@lemmy.mlY

    China Just Dropped Another Bomb on America's Frontier AI Companies

    Technology technology
    46
    0 Votazioni
    46 Post
    17 Visualizzazioni
    qinshihuangsshlong@lemmy.mlQ
    You condemn the union? Wow you are evil. A pro confederacy pacifist now that's a first. Do you also condemn the allies? The ANC? The IRA? The militant unions who won the 8 hour work day and 5 day workweek? and If your answer to any of this is no you have quite the inconsistent position. whataboutism Nonsense word used by shithead debatebros to avoid comparative argument that would expose their hypocrisy and inconsistencies.

Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.