Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.
📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS of user pins to train it's AI!
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840
Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".
What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!
It even includes "limited personal information".
Grounds for a lawsuit?
¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!
² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?
Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840
Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".
What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!
It even includes "limited personal information".
Grounds for a lawsuit?
¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!
² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?
Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1
. -
¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1
.Yeah, but if we assume that one row means 50 csam images, it sounds even more outrageous.
Being reasonable never got anyone any clicks.
-
¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1
.Yeah, it's not even capitalized in the source article, so OP just invented a new unit to be 4-6x more outraged, lol.
Unless it refers to the famous Really Outrageously Wide Stack, usually representing stacks of 16386 records each. Omg, it's over 8 TRILLION pins!
In short, Pinterest sucks and OP enjoys clickbait writing style. Avoiding both is probably the best way forward.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840
Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it's AI!Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims "users have granted Pinterest a license".
What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn't a thing in 2009!
It even includes "limited personal information".
Grounds for a lawsuit?
¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins!
² Post would sound way worse wouldn't it?
Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterestThis post has triggered my outrage!
...because this is totally normal database stuff. Like, where's the meat? My phone could handle 500 million rows of data. Is that supposed to be a lot?
I'm not exaggerating about the phone part: A modern smartphone can handle an SQLite DB with billions of records (aka "ROWS", LOL).
-
¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1
. -
Well pins are usually organized in rows of 4-6, when displayed on Pinterest and in a database each row could have a different type of data, therefore it really isn't that clear to me.
Ah, that makes sense too. I just wanted to add my two cents as a software developer. Could be either database rows or graphical rows, I guess.
-
This post has triggered my outrage!
...because this is totally normal database stuff. Like, where's the meat? My phone could handle 500 million rows of data. Is that supposed to be a lot?
I'm not exaggerating about the phone part: A modern smartphone can handle an SQLite DB with billions of records (aka "ROWS", LOL).
📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS of user pins to train it's AI! - Lemmy.World
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51671840 [https://lemmy.world/post/51671840] > 📌 Pinterest used ~500 Million ROWS¹ of user pins² to train it’s AI! > > Data from 2009-Now, however the Social Media corp claims “users have granted Pinterest a license”. > > What license? Pretty sure AI training fine print wasn’t a thing in 2009! > > It even includes “limited personal information”. > > Grounds for a lawsuit? 🤓 > > ¹ Never heard of this unit ever before, but even if we assume 1 ROW = 4-6 Pins that is 2-3 BILLION user Pins! > > ² Post would sound way worse wouldn’t it? > > 🔗 Source: https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest [https://help.pinterest.com/en/article/ai-at-pinterest]
(lemmy.world)
Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.
Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.
Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗
Registrati Accedi
Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy