Which of the top 4 Fediverse server projects will be the first to implement the ActivityPub API?

Which of the top 4 Fediverse server projects will be the first to implement the ActivityPub API?

#EvanPoll #poll #ActivityPub #ActivityPubAPI

Number 5 is WordPress and they have it implemented already!

@evan I don't get it, isn't the point of these four supporting AP?

@golemwire it's OK not to respond to polls about topics you don't understand!

This repo might help a bit.

GitHub - swicg/activitypub-api: ActivityPub API Task Force repository.

ActivityPub API Task Force repository. Contribute to swicg/activitypub-api development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub (github.com)

@golemwire ActivityPub has two main parts; a social API and a federation protocol. All of these platforms support the protocol but not the API (at least, not in read-write form).

Rankings from fedidb.com which skips Flipboard and Threads.

@evan Oh!
> Instead, they often implement platform-specific APIs, with a narrow range of functionality. Mastodon, for example, implements the Mastodon API, which focuses primarily on microblogging. Threads implements the Threads API. Many other ActivityPub implementers have APIs that clone the Mastodon API, to make it easier for users to adapt third-party Mastodon clients to their platforms.

That's really cool. Thank you so much for working on stuff like this, it makes a difference (you know

#500CharsOnTheDot

@evan how come Mastodon does not implement it already ???

@evan do Flipboard and Threads implement it ?

@evan @golemwire Thank you for the explanation.

@padeluun @evan @golemwire We support both UUCP and ZConnect ..#scnr

@evan Option 5: the API will be abandoned, due to developer disinterest, in turn because most users just use the apps that are handed to them.

@evan
I voted based on funding size

Am I understanding it right that it's essentially the same C2S AP, but with clarifications and improvements that make it more practical to implement?

@df only a few experimental ones.

@politipet no, but I think Threads has more users than a few of these.

@jj @gotosocial that would be cool! Pleroma already has it, I think.

@evan @gotosocial at the same time I think they should do it at a comfortable pace, don't want em to burn out adding a whole new API spec

also totally unbiased as a personal GoToSocial server admin lol

@evan@cosocial.ca @jj@social.jjgadgets.tech @gotosocial@gts.superseriousbusiness.org Pleroma has it, but it's been disabled by default for like 2 years because it had some vulnerabilities in the past and is not used often. However it can be enabled with just a single toggle.