Uhh yeah lol

Every source you've given so far has been massively biased lol.

Just because it's biased doesn't mean it's wrong. The National Enquirer broke the Jonathan Edwards story. It's the worst of the worst, but they had a real story

And you think this is on the same level?

There's dozens of sources about it, just stop

China tells its minorities to integrate or face consequences with sweeping new law | CNN

For years, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has pushed ethnic minority groups like Tibetans and Uyghurs to adopt an identity rooted in Chinese nationality and allegiance to the ruling Communist Party.

CNN (edition.cnn.com)

(www.telegraph.co.uk)

nytimes.com

(www.nytimes.com)

Ethnic Unity Law Enforces Mandatory Assimilation - Jamestown

(jamestown.org)

Weird that none of them are from China, despite you being from China (supposedly)

I wish you people would learn what a fucking source is; a single source being cited by multiple outlets does not magically mean there are lots of sources.

I know you don't actually believe that teaching the national language in schools is genocide; if that was true you'd basically have to believe that every western country is committing genocide. Thus the fact that you're trying to use that as your argument anyway can only mean that you have no problem being knowingly dishonest and bad faith if it lets you attack China

"Please don't tell me about the country I live in, that's Washington based think tanks' job!"

I certainly don't believe local media that's completely state-run and censored

It's not the part about teaching the language. It's the removing of another one I have an issue with

Which one source are you referring to

China doesn't have free press

More free then anything you're citing

Maybe you should actually read the shit you post before posting it

You literally said you had a problem with them using Mandarin

"I know better because I live in China, but only Westerners from Washington DC can be trusted about China!"