<![CDATA[Chinese researchers say missile lidar model can spot US F-35 at up to 61.5km]]>This post did not contain any content.
Link Preview Image
Chinese researchers say missile lidar model can spot US F-35 at up to 61.5km

Chinese air force supplier models airborne single-photon lidar to spot stealth fighters without triggering radar or heat sensors.

favicon

South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com)
]]>https://citiverse.it/topic/802b90e5-334b-4db4-a599-cd48e7182b40/chinese-researchers-say-missile-lidar-model-can-spot-us-f-35-at-up-to-61.5kmRSS for NodeMon, 05 Oct 2026 11:18:12 GMTThu, 01 Oct 2026 18:43:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Chinese researchers say missile lidar model can spot US F-35 at up to 61.5km on Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:07:56 GMT]]>i hope you're a millionaire -- i marvel when people have knowledge this specialized but are financially hobbled as i am. lol

]]>https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.ml/comment/28113213https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.ml/comment/28113213Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:07:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Chinese researchers say missile lidar model can spot US F-35 at up to 61.5km on Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:49:16 GMT]]>Yeah thats unsurprising. SPL has been rolling out in the US for a while and usually gets sold for very wide area collects at low density, simply because you can fly so much higher. I'm not sure it really found its footing there, considering how much better/ cheaper other technologies coming from multicamera systems like vexcels have come, simply because lidar can rarely compete on price.

I did a pepsi challenge using a few systems a couple years back. I think we had full waveform, SPL, and then some leica system in the mix. SPL was the loser, but in that context. It makes total sense if you need to map over a long distance but small area, fairly cheaply/ efficiently.

]]>https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/26115827https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/26115827Thu, 01 Oct 2026 19:49:16 GMT