<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[GDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liable]]></title><description><![CDATA[<em>This post did not contain any content.</em>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://www.heise.de/en/news/GDPR-trap-Smart-Glasses-Why-Ray-Ban-Meta-wearers-can-be-held-liable-11451626.html" title="GDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liable">
<img src="https://heise.cloudimg.io/v7/_www-heise-de_/imgs/18/5/1/6/4/2/7/3/shutterstock_2397215569-1d86dbbfb56eb2ef.jpg?func&#x3D;bound&amp;height&#x3D;1200&amp;org_if_sml&#x3D;1&amp;q&#x3D;85&amp;width&#x3D;1200" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height: 15rem;" alt="Link Preview Image" onerror="this.parentElement.remove()" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a class="text-decoration-none" href="https://www.heise.de/en/news/GDPR-trap-Smart-Glasses-Why-Ray-Ban-Meta-wearers-can-be-held-liable-11451626.html">
GDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liable
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">A new report: Anyone filming uninvolved third parties with smart glasses or allowing Meta’s AI training loses the household exemption privilege.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://www.heise.de/en/news/GDPR-trap-Smart-Glasses-Why-Ray-Ban-Meta-wearers-can-be-held-liable-11451626.html" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://www.heise.de/favicon.ico?v&#x3D;JykvN0w9Yf" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width: 21px; max-height: 21px;" onerror="this.remove()"/>











<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0">heise online <span class="text-secondary">(www.heise.de)</span></p>
</a>
</div></div>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/topic/55a4643c-557f-430c-a4a5-0ef363f5d47c/gdpr-trap-smart-glasses-why-ray-ban-meta-wearers-can-be-held-liable</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 03:41:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://citiverse.it/topic/55a4643c-557f-430c-a4a5-0ef363f5d47c.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:28:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liable on Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:43:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">That's not good as good news as the title makes it sound.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">According to the analysis, anyone walking through the city with the glasses would have to inform passers-by verbally in advance or even wear high-visibility vests with inscriptions to comply with the rulings of the European Court of Justice. Particularly sensitive areas include doctor’s offices, demonstrations, women’s shelters, or playgrounds. The use of Ray-Ban Meta AI Glasses in public spaces is therefore difficult to make legally compliant from a data protection perspective.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Since it's up to the individuals to disclose, they're the ones at fault. So you'd have to know you were being recorded, and by who, and then hold them accountable. That's pretty much impossible.</p>
<p dir="auto">But more importantly, meta is no longer held responsible, and they can just continue fucking up people's privacy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.my-box.dev/comment/930960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://lemmy.my-box.dev/comment/930960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[admin@lemmy.my-box.dev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:43:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>