<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[So if we want to stop this infighting, should we push everybody to use #wafrn and help develop it instead and automatically support both protocols?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So if we want to stop this infighting, should we push everybody to use <a href="https://liberal.city/tags/wafrn" rel="tag">#<span>wafrn</span></a> and help develop it instead and automatically support both protocols? how does it work differently vs the normal <a href="https://liberal.city/tags/ATproto" rel="tag">#<span>ATproto</span></a> infrastructure or an <a href="https://liberal.city/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a> instance? no more need to bridge etc? would this be similar to what happened with IMAP, SMTP and POP3 for email?</p><p>cc <span><a href="/user/j12t%40j12t.social">@<span>j12t</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/quillmatiq%40mastodon.social">@<span>quillmatiq</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mackuba%40martianbase.net">@<span>mackuba</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mastodonmigration%40mastodon.online">@<span>mastodonmigration</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/gabboman%40gabboman.xyz">@<span>gabboman</span></a></span></p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/topic/2c570933-f2f4-49b2-9fcf-1c6d7956e931/so-if-we-want-to-stop-this-infighting-should-we-push-everybody-to-use-wafrn-and-help-develop-it-instead-and-automatically-support-both-protocols</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:15:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://citiverse.it/topic/2c570933-f2f4-49b2-9fcf-1c6d7956e931.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:38:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So if we want to stop this infighting, should we push everybody to use #wafrn and help develop it instead and automatically support both protocols? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:00:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/wjmaggos%40liberal.city" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>wjmaggos@liberal.city</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/quillmatiq%40mastodon.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>quillmatiq@mastodon.social</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mastodonmigration%40mastodon.online" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>mastodonmigration@mastodon.online</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/j12t%40j12t.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>j12t@j12t.social</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mackuba%40martianbase.net" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>mackuba@martianbase.net</span></a></span></p><p>I will also say: wafrn is janky as hell. Im working to make it even worse. People should hosts more wafrns and someone should make a fork at some point</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://gabboman.xyz/fediverse/post/b396e522-5e4c-492c-831c-898a514e5f24</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://gabboman.xyz/fediverse/post/b396e522-5e4c-492c-831c-898a514e5f24</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gabboman@gabboman.xyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:00:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to So if we want to stop this infighting, should we push everybody to use #wafrn and help develop it instead and automatically support both protocols? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:59:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/wjmaggos%40liberal.city" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>wjmaggos@liberal.city</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/quillmatiq%40mastodon.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>quillmatiq@mastodon.social</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mastodonmigration%40mastodon.online" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>mastodonmigration@mastodon.online</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/j12t%40j12t.social" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>j12t@j12t.social</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/mackuba%40martianbase.net" rel="nofollow noopener">@<span>mackuba@martianbase.net</span></a></span></p><p>Wafrn does not use the bsky infra for obtaining bluesky posts, we get them directly from the PDS. </p>
<p>We use A jetstream (one of many available, a thing very easy to self host. Mini firehose. Also easy to host) to get the events, when we get one event we check if we need to store it (post by followed user, post in reply…). If so, we directly call the pds and ask for the post.</p>
<p>Wafrn servers were not affected by the event of a few days ago</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://gabboman.xyz/fediverse/post/e5e3bf36-da61-4f92-88e4-6e67772e91ca</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://gabboman.xyz/fediverse/post/e5e3bf36-da61-4f92-88e4-6e67772e91ca</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gabboman@gabboman.xyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:59:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>