Salta al contenuto
Citiverse è uno spazio aperto a tutte le comunità. Se vuoi aprire un gruppo locale o una sezione per la tua organizzazione, puoi contattare gli amministratori: pagina dei contatti.

opinion: lemmy instances - should disclose basic hardware and infrastructure in "about" section. Most lemmy instances cant afford to have non-text users

Fediverse
73 23 0
  • When you choose a Lemmy home instance, you're trusting somebody else's infrastructure with your account, posts, comments, and uploaded media.

    If that instance disappears without a usable backup or migration path, years of your contributions can disappear with it.

    Yet when I look at most instances, I have absolutely no idea what I'm trusting.

    Is this running on:

    • A $5 VPS?
    • A dedicated server with redundant storage?
    • Someone's mini PC under their desk?
    • AWS with costs that explode exponentially as traffic increases and hapless admin not realizing that just shutting it down as they never had a plan?
    • A database with proper backups?
    • A server with no backups at all?

    I recently had an instance tell me my posting activity alone was becoming too expensive for them. Their solution was - just banning me and removing all my data. no im not kidding - thx https://lemmy.radio/.

    That immediately makes me wonder: what are you running? (apparently it was aws micro or something and person clearly had no idea what they were doing)

    If a few hundred posts can create a meaningful financial problem, is the instance massively undersized? Are you paying enterprise hyperscaler prices for workloads that could run cheaply on dedicated hardware? Is storage the problem? Bandwidth? Pictrs? Database load? Do you even have a plan my friends?

    I don't know, because users are given almost zero infrastructure information.

    I'm not asking admins to publish IP addresses, network diagrams, credentials, or anything security-sensitive.

    Just put some basics in /about:

    • Hosting: OVH / Hetzner / AWS / home-hosted / etc.
    • Compute: 8 cores / 32 GB RAM
    • Storage: 2 TB NVMe
    • Backups: Daily, retained 30 days
    • Media backups: Yes / No
    • Off-site backups: Yes / No
    • Approximate capacity: Small / Medium / Large
    • Funding: Self-funded / donations / nonprofit / etc.

    That tells me infinitely more about whether I'm comfortable making an instance my home.

    • Have admin(s) ever hosted any production software before? First time?
    • are there even backups?
    • Is there even any plans for scalability? What if your traffic goes 4x? what about 20x? do you have a plan beyond banning me and removing everythig I ever posted?
      And honestly, backups matter to same tune as CPU model.

    Federation gives us the freedom to choose our instance. Great.

    But you can't make an informed choice when you have no idea whether your digital home is a properly backed-up server or a $5 VPS held together with Docker Compose and prayers.

    Is that the reason why all lemmy instances dont let you upload more than 5Mb media? probably.

    If you cant afford hosting costs - holy fuck, just stop fucking saying "everyone welcome" if you then going to ban those same "welcomed" people after they post 10 image memes (thx https://sopuli.xyz/ and https://lemmy.zip/ and https://lemmy.radio/ and https://lemmy.ml/). no no - 👏you 👏 cant 👏 afford 👏 non-text 👏 users 👏, - instead you falsely accuse people of spamming and banning their accounts. No wonder lemmy is at 35k MAU. Hardware poor admins - you don't even know what spamming is, you shouldn't have kids users if you cant afford them, dont invite them in or just advertise your instances as text-only.

    Hardware poor admins - stop inviting people. you have no capacity and only actively harming lemmy adoption.

    There should be a list of such instances that should be inviting people at all.

    Instance infrastructure shouldn't be a mystery.

    If you're asking users to build years of history on your server, give them enough information to understand what they're building it on. You likely cant afford non-text users anyways.

    I don't know the details, and honestly I don't really care for the drama, but if you're not happy with the current options for servers and governance, just host your own?

    You seem to have a pretty clear idea of what you want to operate like, and you said in another response, that you have experience building servers.

    It's not hard to get a server built that has enough compute and storage to support the kind of capacity you're talking about. Any used, corporate desktop from the last 7-10 years has more than enough compute to handle hundreds of active users. Storage is the main issue, but that's not unattainable either. As of a week ago, Server Monkey was selling certified refurbished Dell enterprise 6TB HDDs for $175 each. $700 gets you around 18TB with one disk for redundancy using ZFS. 18TB will hold quite a bit of dank memes, especially if you limit the max resolution to something reasonable.

    1,500 new pictures per day, all 50 megapixel JPEGs is roughly 670GB per month, so even at that pretty crazy rate (by Lemmy standards) your 18TB server would last two years before getting totally full.

    Backblaze archival storage is $1,500 per year for 18TB if you want long term secure cloud backups for your entire server, that's just $125 a month that you'd need to fund yourself or get donations for. Not nothing, but hardly unattainable for a small instance. I used to play on a tiny Minecraft server that had maybe 20 active players, and they made more than $125 per month on donations.

    I mean, again, all of this code is FOSS. If you really feel that your approach would be significantly more successful, dive in and build out your own instance. Get some friends involved, split up the costs, market yourselves, get some nice branding, build alliances and partnerships with other instances, etc. There is literally nothing stopping you.

  • Jesus Christ, everyone here seems to have invented their own definition of what Lemmy is.

    Lemmy doesn't have competitors. It isn't competing. It isn't what you think it is.

    Except the actual Lemmy developers describe it as:

    "a decentralized alternative to Reddit and other link aggregators"

    They've been calling it a Reddit alternative since at least 2020.

    So no, I'm not imposing some imaginary "corporate framing" onto Lemmy. I'm using basically the same framing its own developers used to explain why they built it.

    And "there is no manager or corporate goal" doesn't mean adoption suddenly becomes meaningless. If you're building an alternative to corporate-controlled link aggregators, whether anybody actually adopts the alternative fucking matters.

    Otherwise what are we celebrating? Software existing?

    And that's why 35k MAU matters to me. Reddit has spent years handing alternatives opportunities on a silver platter, and Lemmy hasn't capitalized on them.

    You can personally define success as "35k enthusiasts are happy." Fine.

    But stop pretending your definition of Lemmy is the official one while telling everyone else "you don't understand what Lemmy is." Even the developers explicitly called it a Reddit alternative.

    Jesus Christ, everyone here seems to have invented their own definition of what Lemmy is.

    Including you.

    Except the actual Lemmy developers describe it as:

    “a decentralized alternative to Reddit and other link aggregators”

    They’ve been calling it a Reddit alternative since at least 2020.

    Yes, they’ve been calling it an alternative, not a competitor. They created Lemmy because their communist & anti-imperialist subreddits kept getting banned from Reddit. Such communities are antithetical to capitalism, so they’d likely be banned from any corporate platform, not only Reddit.

    Lemmy was created in August 2019 by two communist developers known as Dessalines and Nutomic. Their goal for Lemmy was to provide an open-source alternative to Reddit that anyone could self-host and federate with other Lemmy instances, effectively exchanging content between platforms.

  • Jesus Christ, everyone here seems to have invented their own definition of what Lemmy is.

    Including you.

    Except the actual Lemmy developers describe it as:

    “a decentralized alternative to Reddit and other link aggregators”

    They’ve been calling it a Reddit alternative since at least 2020.

    Yes, they’ve been calling it an alternative, not a competitor. They created Lemmy because their communist & anti-imperialist subreddits kept getting banned from Reddit. Such communities are antithetical to capitalism, so they’d likely be banned from any corporate platform, not only Reddit.

    Lemmy was created in August 2019 by two communist developers known as Dessalines and Nutomic. Their goal for Lemmy was to provide an open-source alternative to Reddit that anyone could self-host and federate with other Lemmy instances, effectively exchanging content between platforms.

    That's just semantics. An alternative competes for the same users.

    Your own source says Lemmy was created because Reddit was banning their communities. The whole point was giving those people somewhere else to go.

    Call it an alternative, competitor, or communist escape pod. 😂 The question is the same:

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

  • That's just semantics. An alternative competes for the same users.

    Your own source says Lemmy was created because Reddit was banning their communities. The whole point was giving those people somewhere else to go.

    Call it an alternative, competitor, or communist escape pod. 😂 The question is the same:

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    The communists & anti-imperialists who regularly get banned from corporate social media have adopted it. Obviously that represents “almost nobody” in comparison to corporate media’s user base. Anyone else who adopts Lemmy is a side-effect to the developers’ core goal of creating protected communities for anti-capitalists and anti-imperialists.

  • The communists & anti-imperialists who regularly get banned from corporate social media have adopted it. Obviously that represents “almost nobody” in comparison to corporate media’s user base. Anyone else who adopts Lemmy is a side-effect to the developers’ core goal of creating protected communities for anti-capitalists and anti-imperialists.

    is that why lemmy has no hardware resources - they all communists?
    also - are non communists allowed to join?

  • is that why lemmy has no hardware resources - they all communists?
    also - are non communists allowed to join?

    Most Lemmy users aren’t communists, so they obviously are allowed to join, except in the case of Lemmygrad, which is explicitly Marxist-Leninist.

    Consider also that Lemmy isn’t the entire threadiverse/fediverse. PeerTube, for instance, is optimized for video, which dwarf the storage requirements of images.

  • That's just semantics. An alternative competes for the same users.

    Your own source says Lemmy was created because Reddit was banning their communities. The whole point was giving those people somewhere else to go.

    Call it an alternative, competitor, or communist escape pod. 😂 The question is the same:

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    That it has the model of reddit without it's userbase.

    Lemmy is never going to be as big as reddit. It financially cannot be. It doesn't want to be.

    Now, their are several options you can take from here. You can either spin up your own instance which abides by your own rules; join an existing instance and learn to live with the rules there; or don't change anything, keep on whining about reality not altering itself to your whims, become bitter and annoyed and eventually leave.

    Which of these options do you think will give you most happiness in the long run?

  • When you choose a Lemmy home instance, you're trusting somebody else's infrastructure with your account, posts, comments, and uploaded media.

    If that instance disappears without a usable backup or migration path, years of your contributions can disappear with it.

    Yet when I look at most instances, I have absolutely no idea what I'm trusting.

    Is this running on:

    • A $5 VPS?
    • A dedicated server with redundant storage?
    • Someone's mini PC under their desk?
    • AWS with costs that explode exponentially as traffic increases and hapless admin not realizing that just shutting it down as they never had a plan?
    • A database with proper backups?
    • A server with no backups at all?

    I recently had an instance tell me my posting activity alone was becoming too expensive for them. Their solution was - just banning me and removing all my data. no im not kidding - thx https://lemmy.radio/.

    That immediately makes me wonder: what are you running? (apparently it was aws micro or something and person clearly had no idea what they were doing)

    If a few hundred posts can create a meaningful financial problem, is the instance massively undersized? Are you paying enterprise hyperscaler prices for workloads that could run cheaply on dedicated hardware? Is storage the problem? Bandwidth? Pictrs? Database load? Do you even have a plan my friends?

    I don't know, because users are given almost zero infrastructure information.

    I'm not asking admins to publish IP addresses, network diagrams, credentials, or anything security-sensitive.

    Just put some basics in /about:

    • Hosting: OVH / Hetzner / AWS / home-hosted / etc.
    • Compute: 8 cores / 32 GB RAM
    • Storage: 2 TB NVMe
    • Backups: Daily, retained 30 days
    • Media backups: Yes / No
    • Off-site backups: Yes / No
    • Approximate capacity: Small / Medium / Large
    • Funding: Self-funded / donations / nonprofit / etc.

    That tells me infinitely more about whether I'm comfortable making an instance my home.

    • Have admin(s) ever hosted any production software before? First time?
    • are there even backups?
    • Is there even any plans for scalability? What if your traffic goes 4x? what about 20x? do you have a plan beyond banning me and removing everythig I ever posted?
      And honestly, backups matter to same tune as CPU model.

    Federation gives us the freedom to choose our instance. Great.

    But you can't make an informed choice when you have no idea whether your digital home is a properly backed-up server or a $5 VPS held together with Docker Compose and prayers.

    Is that the reason why all lemmy instances dont let you upload more than 5Mb media? probably.

    If you cant afford hosting costs - holy fuck, just stop fucking saying "everyone welcome" if you then going to ban those same "welcomed" people after they post 10 image memes (thx https://sopuli.xyz/ and https://lemmy.zip/ and https://lemmy.radio/ and https://lemmy.ml/). no no - 👏you 👏 cant 👏 afford 👏 non-text 👏 users 👏, - instead you falsely accuse people of spamming and banning their accounts. No wonder lemmy is at 35k MAU. Hardware poor admins - you don't even know what spamming is, you shouldn't have kids users if you cant afford them, dont invite them in or just advertise your instances as text-only.

    Hardware poor admins - stop inviting people. you have no capacity and only actively harming lemmy adoption.

    There should be a list of such instances that should be inviting people at all.

    Instance infrastructure shouldn't be a mystery.

    If you're asking users to build years of history on your server, give them enough information to understand what they're building it on. You likely cant afford non-text users anyways.

    Waaa!~ Why won't people give me free compute and storage. ~Waaaa!~

  • That's just semantics. An alternative competes for the same users.

    Your own source says Lemmy was created because Reddit was banning their communities. The whole point was giving those people somewhere else to go.

    Call it an alternative, competitor, or communist escape pod. 😂 The question is the same:

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    Dude the number of daily users today is so astronomically higher than I ever would have imagined five years ago. I literally thought it would stay a small community and maybe max out around a hundred daily posts and I was happy with that because I liked the community. A project being worked on for "almost nobody" is still very worthwhile if the existing community is happy to keep participating, but what it is today is not "almost nobody".

  • What good is an alternative to Reddit if almost nobody adopts it?

    That it has the model of reddit without it's userbase.

    Lemmy is never going to be as big as reddit. It financially cannot be. It doesn't want to be.

    Now, their are several options you can take from here. You can either spin up your own instance which abides by your own rules; join an existing instance and learn to live with the rules there; or don't change anything, keep on whining about reality not altering itself to your whims, become bitter and annoyed and eventually leave.

    Which of these options do you think will give you most happiness in the long run?

    Lemmy is never going to be as big as Reddit. It financially cannot be.

    Why not? That's exactly the kind of assumption I'm questioning.

    Federation is supposed to make scaling easier to distribute. More users can mean more instances, more admins, more donations, more infrastructure, and costs spread across the network.

    "It can't grow because we can't afford growth" isn't some fundamental property of federation. It's an infrastructure problem to solve.

    And "it doesn't want to be" keeps coming up. Lemmy is software. It doesn't want anything. Different users, admins, and developers clearly have very different ideas about what it should become.

    I'm interested in seeing how far it can go, not declaring its ceiling in advance.

  • Lemmy is never going to be as big as Reddit. It financially cannot be.

    Why not? That's exactly the kind of assumption I'm questioning.

    Federation is supposed to make scaling easier to distribute. More users can mean more instances, more admins, more donations, more infrastructure, and costs spread across the network.

    "It can't grow because we can't afford growth" isn't some fundamental property of federation. It's an infrastructure problem to solve.

    And "it doesn't want to be" keeps coming up. Lemmy is software. It doesn't want anything. Different users, admins, and developers clearly have very different ideas about what it should become.

    I'm interested in seeing how far it can go, not declaring its ceiling in advance.

    Because to compete with reddit, you need reddit funds. To get those funds, you need to be inoffensive for the sponsors, and attractive to the lowest common denominator in order to attract eyeballs.

    Lemmy isn't just software, it's community, formed by people. People who like it small, because once it grows too big, quality plummets. And that's what people here want to prevent. If you want reddit, go to reddit.

  • Because to compete with reddit, you need reddit funds. To get those funds, you need to be inoffensive for the sponsors, and attractive to the lowest common denominator in order to attract eyeballs.

    Lemmy isn't just software, it's community, formed by people. People who like it small, because once it grows too big, quality plummets. And that's what people here want to prevent. If you want reddit, go to reddit.

    I don't mind reddit content. I want reddit without using reddit it's that simpe

  • I don't mind reddit content. I want reddit without using reddit it's that simpe

    So what, so far, has given you the indication that lemmy and its users are the best place / willing to provide that?


Citiverse è un progetto che si basa su NodeBB ed è federato! | Categorie federate | Chat | 📱 Installa web app o APK | 🧡 Donazioni | Privacy Policy

Il server utilizzato è quello di Webdock, in Danimarca. Se volete provarlo potete ottenere il 20% di sconto con questo link e noi riceveremo un aiuto sotto forma di credito da usare proprio per mantenere Citiverse.