<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn't require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? The JavaScript dependency is a security risk and user hostile. Visitors should not be required to enable JavaScript when simply visiting a Mastodon server. Plus, the recommendation to use a native app doesn't even work for all Mastodon/ActivityPub instances.</p><p>Also, the requirement for JavaScript makes the Mastodon development team seem incompetent. They can't even make a basic web site that doesn't require JavaScript. I could do that when I was in middle school.</p><p>&gt;To use the Mastodon web application, please enable JavaScript. Alternatively, try one of the native apps for Mastodon for your platform.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Mastodon" rel="tag">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/MastoAdmin" rel="tag">#<span>MastoAdmin</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/SelfHost" rel="tag">#<span>SelfHost</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Security" rel="tag">#<span>Security</span></a></p>

<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/116/579/274/004/937/171/original/261527b6f37611c1.jpg" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/topic/0532ed8a-552e-4f7b-9677-8cb64490fac4/does-anyone-have-recommendations-for-a-mastodon-fork-that-doesn-t-require-visitors-to-enable-javascript-to-view-basic-content</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 09:01:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://citiverse.it/topic/0532ed8a-552e-4f7b-9677-8cb64490fac4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 16:34:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@seanm">@<span>seanm</span></a></span> Since you're obviously smarter than the Masto team, why don't you code that up? The API is stable and well documented.</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://cosocial.ca/users/timbray/statuses/116579558015059543</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://cosocial.ca/users/timbray/statuses/116579558015059543</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[timbray@cosocial.ca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:34:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:50:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/smallcircles%40social.coop">@<span>smallcircles</span></a></span> <span><a href="https://social.erick.sh/@erick">@<span>erick</span></a></span> thank you. I'll take a look at those. I appreciate that the site doesn't require JavaScript just to view.</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579382649068423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579382649068423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[seanm@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:50:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:47:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://social.erick.sh/@erick">@<span>erick</span></a></span> it's crazy that this is such a problem. Old Reddit, Twitter, Gmail, and most every popular website started as HTML/CSS functional. There are frontends like Nitter (for Twitter) that show this functionality is still possible.</p><p>Why is there such a drive to be so hostile to users and increase the risk to visitors?</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579372377609776</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579372377609776</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[seanm@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:47:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:45:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://social.erick.sh/@erick">@<span>erick</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/seanm%40infosec.exchange">@<span>seanm</span></a></span> </p><p>I am not sure either, but for a good overview I can point you to the delightful fediverse experience curated list I maintain at:</p><p><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-fediverse-experience/" title="delightful fediverse experience">
<img src="https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-logo.png" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height: 15rem;" alt="Link Preview Image" onerror="this.parentElement.remove()" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a class="text-decoration-none" href="https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-fediverse-experience/">
delightful fediverse experience
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">Delightful curated lists of free software, open science and information sources.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-fediverse-experience/" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://delightful.coding.social/favicon.png" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width: 21px; max-height: 21px;" onerror="this.remove()"/>



<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0"> <span class="text-secondary">(delightful.coding.social)</span></p>
</a>
</div></p><p>There are 2 other fedi related list, see.. <a href="https://delightful.coding.social/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>delightful.coding.social/</span><span></span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/116579364148375615</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/116579364148375615</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[smallcircles@social.coop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:45:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:44:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/jerry%40infosec.exchange">@<span>jerry</span></a></span> unfortunately, it is just a blank page with JavaScript disabled.</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579358698912182</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579358698912182</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[seanm@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:44:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:43:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, I think JavaScript is fine for authenticated or more complex content. If I'm a user of a server, it seems acceptable that I should trust it and enable JavaScript.</p><p>However, if I am some random visitor to your instance and just trying to view a post or user profile, that should not require JavaScript.</p><p>The JavaScript ecosystem (e.g., npm) is rife with supply chain hacks. Plus, there are many poorly maintained Mastodon instances (e.g., mastodon.social, I think?). Although, I guess those poorly maintained instances are not pulling down the latest backdoored npm packages... Regardless, it is a security risk to require visitors run JavaScript from every instance they visit for simple content.</p><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Mastodon" rel="tag">#<span>Mastodon</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/ActivityPub" rel="tag">#<span>ActivityPub</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/InfoSec" rel="tag">#<span>InfoSec</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/Security" rel="tag">#<span>Security</span></a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/tags/MastoAdmin" rel="tag">#<span>MastoAdmin</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579355682495395</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/seanm/statuses/116579355682495395</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[seanm@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:43:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:34:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/seanm%40infosec.exchange" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener">@<span>seanm</span></a></span> more than a fork, sounds that what you are looking for is an alternative front end that can be configure as the default on your site.</p><p>Unfortunately I have no idea if the is such thing. I know there are plenty of alternative web clients, but again, as far as I can tell that is now what you are looking for.</p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://social.erick.sh/users/erick/statuses/01KRP4CMRJGT7JEEJW685JRMB8</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://social.erick.sh/users/erick/statuses/01KRP4CMRJGT7JEEJW685JRMB8</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[erick@social.erick.sh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does anyone have recommendations for a Mastodon fork that doesn&#x27;t require visitors to enable JavaScript to view basic content? on Fri, 15 May 2026 15:31:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@seanm">@<span>seanm</span></a></span> I am not 100% sure it works without javascript, but try: <a href="https://elk.infosec.exchange/" rel="nofollow noopener"><span>https://</span><span>elk.infosec.exchange/</span><span></span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jerry/statuses/116579309877513326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/post/https://infosec.exchange/users/jerry/statuses/116579309877513326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jerry@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:31:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>