<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with fepf228]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with fepf228]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/tags/fepf228</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:29:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://citiverse.it/tags/fepf228.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:37:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[FEP-f228: Backfilling conversations has been updated:https:&#x2F;&#x2F;codeberg.org&#x2F;fediverse&#x2F;fep&#x2F;pulls&#x2F;853]]></title><description><![CDATA[@mike@macgirvin.com for what it's worth (and I say this not knowing how streams and forte work), processing activities and objects can be done in a way where code paths are reused. However I think that's easier when you're object-first (as NodeBB is), and if you rely on activities to provide context around the object, then a collection of objects makes little sense.
In that case, not supporting the collection of objects is probably also okay.
]]></description><link>https://citiverse.it/topic/ffeb4bcf-5d0f-41af-898d-ba10745d501e/fep-f228-backfilling-conversations-has-been-updated-https-codeberg.org-fediverse-fep-pulls-853</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://citiverse.it/topic/ffeb4bcf-5d0f-41af-898d-ba10745d501e/fep-f228-backfilling-conversations-has-been-updated-https-codeberg.org-fediverse-fep-pulls-853</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[julian@activitypub.space]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 18:37:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>